It also takes no preparation beyond sticking ingredients in the hopper, which can be advantageous for saving time for a colonist who would otherwise need to cook for the locust swarm that is Rimworld pawns. So if you find the mood hit more affordable than food, nutrient paste has it's value in providing somewhere in the region of twice the food that simple meals do. And keep in mind that in that comparison it's a fine meal, which requires both veggies and meat (or some kind of animal product), and has more nutrition than a simple meal. So nutrient paste does have it's advantages in colonies with crappy cooks, or ones that are on the edge of starvation. It only consumes 6 ingredients to produce a meal with 0.9 nutrition, whereas fine meal or pemmican use 10 ingredients to provide the same amount.Ī second less important advantage is that nutrient paste meals never cause food poisoning, while meals prepared by a cook always have a chance of causing food poisoning." The greatest advantage is that it is extremely efficient on food reserves. Place the hoppers inside the freezer, attached to the dispenser. Place the part where pawns will have to interact (the white circle) outside of the freezer and use the body of the dispenser as a wall. Getting enough plants to make enough kibble could be a problem. I also play on a map where I can grow plants for just 30 days per year. I'm playing with a mod that allows me to produce and stockpile nutrient paste, I'm feeding my animals with it and my muffalos multiply really fast what cost me so much food. "Nutrient paste meals have advantages over meals prepared by a cook. A strategy to make sure that the food in the hoppers doesn’t spoil is to build the nutrient paste dispenser in a wall. Just wanna know what will cost less food.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |